The Complete Package

 

Home

Online Filing FAQs

Tax Tips

Tax Tip 2012

2011 Tax Deadlines

Do I need an Extension?

IRA Deductions

Revised Making Work Pay

Amending filed Returns

5 Popular Breaks Expire

Forgiven Debt Such as...

Save with Tax Deductions

Dude, Where's My Refund?

Sandwich Generation

Education Benefits Extend

Energy Credit Reduced

Earned Income Credit EITC

Overlooked Deductions

Making Work Pay Credit

American Opportunity Cred

9 Common Errors

1st Time Home Buying

Reat Estate Tax Deduction

Mortgage Debt Forgiven

Supported Federal Forms

Supported State Returns

Federal Tax Forms

State Websites

Where's My Refund?

Security and Privacy

About Our Company

Contact Us

COURT LIMITS EMPLOYER ACCESS TO WORKER MESSAGES

A federal appeals court has made it more difficult for employers to snoop legally on e-mails and text messages their workers send from company accounts.

Under a ruling by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, employers that contract an outside business to transmit text messages cannot read them unless the worker agrees.

Users of text-messaging services "have a reason able expectation of privacy" regarding messages stored on the service provider's network, Judge Kim Wardlaw wrote in the three-judge panel's unanimous opinion.

The ruling also lets employers access employee e-mails only
if they are kept on an internal servicer.

The text-message part of the ruling will affect more employers than the e-mail portion because most U.S. companies pay outside parties for text-messaging but keep e-mail on internal servers.

The judges had few precedents. The extent to which the Fourth Amendment provides protection for the contents of electronic communications in the Internet Age is an open question.

A civil liberties advocacy group called the ruling a "tremendous victory" for online privacy. The Electronic Frontier Foundation said in a posting online that the ruling helps ensure the Fourth Amendment "applies to your communications online just as strongly as it does to packages and letters:”

The ruling came in a lawsuit file by Ontario police Sgt. Jeff Quon and three other officers after Arch Wireless gave their department transcripts of Quon’s text messages in 2002. Police officials read the messages to determine whether department-issued pagers were being used solely for work purposes. There is an expected appeal.


Home | Online Filing FAQs |  Tax Tips | Supported Federal Forms
Supported State Returns | Federal Tax Forms | State Websites About Our Company | Contact Us | Affiliate Program Site Map | Resources | Link to Us
Copyright © 2006 1040return.com - All rights reserved.